<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 things you might not know about CSS sprites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://matchstrike.net/strikepad/2009/11/5-things-you-might-not-know-about-css-sprites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://matchstrike.net/strikepad/2009/11/5-things-you-might-not-know-about-css-sprites/</link>
	<description>Web development and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 14:04:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Riccardo</title>
		<link>http://matchstrike.net/strikepad/2009/11/5-things-you-might-not-know-about-css-sprites/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Riccardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 14:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matchstrike.net/strikepad/?p=19#comment-35</guid>
		<description>I have tried to replace the &quot;BAD&quot; transparent.gif  technique, unsuccesfully. The background image doesn&#039;t appear at all. Tested on chrome and FF... what am I missing? I&#039;d love to suppress those extra HTTP requests to transparent.gif....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have tried to replace the &#8220;BAD&#8221; transparent.gif  technique, unsuccesfully. The background image doesn&#39;t appear at all. Tested on chrome and FF&#8230; what am I missing? I&#39;d love to suppress those extra HTTP requests to transparent.gif&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5 things you might not know about CSS sprites &#8211; Tom Altman&#8217;s Wedia Conversation &#124; Tom Altman&#39;s WebDev Conversation</title>
		<link>http://matchstrike.net/strikepad/2009/11/5-things-you-might-not-know-about-css-sprites/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>5 things you might not know about CSS sprites &#8211; Tom Altman&#8217;s Wedia Conversation &#124; Tom Altman&#39;s WebDev Conversation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 03:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matchstrike.net/strikepad/?p=19#comment-33</guid>
		<description>[...] 5 things you might not know about CSS sprites [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 5 things you might not know about CSS sprites [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: originalgeek</title>
		<link>http://matchstrike.net/strikepad/2009/11/5-things-you-might-not-know-about-css-sprites/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>originalgeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 08:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matchstrike.net/strikepad/?p=19#comment-8</guid>
		<description>One benefit is that there are fewer HTTP requests needed to fetch the image.  Each HTTP request fires cookies up to the web server, which is chewing up the slow side of the user&#039;s bandwidth.  Bandwidth issues aside, sprites don&#039;t suffer from rollover lag because all states of the button are already loaded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One benefit is that there are fewer HTTP requests needed to fetch the image.  Each HTTP request fires cookies up to the web server, which is chewing up the slow side of the user&#39;s bandwidth.  Bandwidth issues aside, sprites don&#39;t suffer from rollover lag because all states of the button are already loaded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Armitage</title>
		<link>http://matchstrike.net/strikepad/2009/11/5-things-you-might-not-know-about-css-sprites/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Armitage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matchstrike.net/strikepad/?p=19#comment-7</guid>
		<description>I understand the reasoning behind the semantic markup and using a background and hiding your html text.  But, I don&#039;t see how having a single image for several elements is useful.  Why spend the effort to postion the map for each element. Is it simply to lower the number of http GET&#039;s? Why not slice them up? Can someone explain that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand the reasoning behind the semantic markup and using a background and hiding your html text.  But, I don&#39;t see how having a single image for several elements is useful.  Why spend the effort to postion the map for each element. Is it simply to lower the number of http GET&#39;s? Why not slice them up? Can someone explain that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5 things you might not know about CSS sprites &#124; tom altman&#39;s wedia conversation</title>
		<link>http://matchstrike.net/strikepad/2009/11/5-things-you-might-not-know-about-css-sprites/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>5 things you might not know about CSS sprites &#124; tom altman&#39;s wedia conversation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matchstrike.net/strikepad/?p=19#comment-6</guid>
		<description>[...] 5 things you might not know about CSS sprites [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 5 things you might not know about CSS sprites [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://matchstrike.net/strikepad/2009/11/5-things-you-might-not-know-about-css-sprites/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 01:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matchstrike.net/strikepad/?p=19#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Another option for existing sites is to use something like SpriteMe: &lt;a href=&quot;http://spriteme.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://spriteme.org/&lt;/a&gt; . It will take your existing images and figure out which ones can be sprited and generate the sprite for you. Pretty slick!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another option for existing sites is to use something like SpriteMe: <a href="http://spriteme.org/" rel="nofollow">http://spriteme.org/</a> . It will take your existing images and figure out which ones can be sprited and generate the sprite for you. Pretty slick!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://matchstrike.net/strikepad/2009/11/5-things-you-might-not-know-about-css-sprites/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matchstrike.net/strikepad/?p=19#comment-4</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Hackernews by TheThomas: The transparent spacer image hack seems horribly antiquated to me. I&#039;m surprised anyone still does it that way....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Hackernews by TheThomas: The transparent spacer image hack seems horribly antiquated to me. I&#8217;m surprised anyone still does it that way&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention 5 things you might not know about CSS sprites -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://matchstrike.net/strikepad/2009/11/5-things-you-might-not-know-about-css-sprites/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention 5 things you might not know about CSS sprites -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matchstrike.net/strikepad/?p=19#comment-3</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by hrjn_rss, YC Hacker News. YC Hacker News said: CSS sprites shouldn&#039;t add production time (and 4 other tips): http://bit.ly/5NUBtr Comments: http://bit.ly/70KRzp [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by hrjn_rss, YC Hacker News. YC Hacker News said: CSS sprites shouldn&#39;t add production time (and 4 other tips): <a href="http://bit.ly/5NUBtr" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/5NUBtr</a> Comments: <a href="http://bit.ly/70KRzp" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/70KRzp</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
